Análisis de la sustitución de la pena privativa de libertad en los delitos de tenencia y porte de armas
Fecha
2017-10
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Políticas
Resumen
La solución de los conflictos sociales no está en tildarlos como graves, cuando los hechos pueden subsanados o cuando no existe mayor conflicto social, sino en hacer sentir a sus asociados la seguridad en el respeto de las leyes penales. El presente trabajo enmarca uno de los mecanismos revolucionarios y alternativas que contempla el Código Orgánico Integral Penal en busca de dar solución al conflicto penal; este es la Sustitución de la Pena Privativa de Libertad en los delitos de Tenencia y Porte de Armas. Hemos de enfocar su aplicación en la legislación ecuatoriana, los parámetros que rigen su adopción, los actores judiciales que se ven envueltos en este procedimiento, los índices de aplicación del mismo, además de un análisis comparado a legislaciones que enfoquen también este mecanismo especial. Específicamente nos enfocaremos en primer lugar a nuestro cuerpo normativo, principalmente la Constitución de la República, y nuestro COIP.
The solution to social conflicts is not to label them as serious, when the facts can be corrected or when there is no greater social conflict, but to make their partners feel safe in the respect of criminal laws. The present work frames one of the revolutionary and alternative mechanisms contemplated by the Comprehensive Criminal Organic Code in search of a solution to the criminal conflict; this is the substitution of the deprivation of liberty penalty in the crimes of Tenure and Porte de Armas. We must focus its application on Ecuadorian legislation, the parameters that govern its adoption, the judicial actors that are involved in this procedure, the application rates thereof, as well as a comparative analysis of laws that also focus on this special mechanism. Specifically, we will focus in the first place on our normative body, mainly the Constitution of the Republic, and our COIP.
The solution to social conflicts is not to label them as serious, when the facts can be corrected or when there is no greater social conflict, but to make their partners feel safe in the respect of criminal laws. The present work frames one of the revolutionary and alternative mechanisms contemplated by the Comprehensive Criminal Organic Code in search of a solution to the criminal conflict; this is the substitution of the deprivation of liberty penalty in the crimes of Tenure and Porte de Armas. We must focus its application on Ecuadorian legislation, the parameters that govern its adoption, the judicial actors that are involved in this procedure, the application rates thereof, as well as a comparative analysis of laws that also focus on this special mechanism. Specifically, we will focus in the first place on our normative body, mainly the Constitution of the Republic, and our COIP.
Descripción
Palabras clave
DELITO, SUSPENSIÓN, PENA, JUSTICIA.