Estudio de la perdida prematura de dientes primarios de 6 a 10 años y tratamiento con mantenedores y recuperadores de espacio de la Facultad Piloto de Odontología
Fecha
2013-06-21
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil. Facultad de Odontología
Resumen
En el caso 1, no se pudo realizar un mantenedor de arco lingual porque
aún era temprana la erupción de los primeros molares permanentes y se
optó por realizar 2 mantenedores de banda y bucle.
En el caso 2, en 3 meses se pudo ganar 3.5 mm la incomodidad de los
pacientes influye mucho en los aparatos removibles, el dolor que provoca
los aparatos hace inaceptable la mantención en boca por el motivo a que
el tratamiento es muy lento, en el tercer mes el paciente iba a las clínicas
odontológicas 1 vez por semana por el disgusto de la placa además hay
muchas posibilidades q se fracturen las placas se recomienda
recuperadores fijos o la ortodoncia con fuerzas lijares preferiblemente con
alambre trenzado para una suave mecánica
En el caso 3, en 3 meses se pudo recuperar 5.5 mm tuvimos un mejor
resultado por la persistencia del paciente, pero tuvo la incomodad en la
masticación se tuvo que rebajar el acrílico del recuperador para que no
tenga contacto.
In case 1, could not be performed because lingual arch maintainer was still early eruption of the first permanent molars and chose to make 2 maintainers band and loop. In case 2, in 3 months 3.5 mm could win the discomfort of patients strongly influences removable appliances, which causes pain equipment maintenance makes unacceptable to mouth on the ground to treatment is very slow, in the third month the patient was going to clinics Dental 1 time per week for the displeasure of the plate there is also q many possibilities to fracture plates is recommended recuperators or fixed orthodontic forces lijares preferably with stranded wire for smooth mechanical In case 3, in 3 months it could recover 5.5 mm had a better result for the persistence of the patient, but he was in incomodad mastication had to cut the acrylic to no recoil has contact.
In case 1, could not be performed because lingual arch maintainer was still early eruption of the first permanent molars and chose to make 2 maintainers band and loop. In case 2, in 3 months 3.5 mm could win the discomfort of patients strongly influences removable appliances, which causes pain equipment maintenance makes unacceptable to mouth on the ground to treatment is very slow, in the third month the patient was going to clinics Dental 1 time per week for the displeasure of the plate there is also q many possibilities to fracture plates is recommended recuperators or fixed orthodontic forces lijares preferably with stranded wire for smooth mechanical In case 3, in 3 months it could recover 5.5 mm had a better result for the persistence of the patient, but he was in incomodad mastication had to cut the acrylic to no recoil has contact.
Descripción
PDF
Palabras clave
ODONTOLOGIA PEDIATRICA, DIENTE, MATERIALES DENTALES