Tutela efectiva de los derechos y la aplicación del procedimiento directo para los PPL: CRS 2 ciudad de Guayaquil
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
2019-09
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Políticas
Resumen
El presente trabajo va dirigido a realizar un análisis sobre LA TUTELA EFECTIVA DE DERECHOS Y LA APLICACION DEL PROCEDIMIENTO DIRECTO ARA LOS PPL: CRS 2 CIUDAD DE GUAYAQUIL, tutela que debe iniciar apenas este Procedimiento Directo entro en vigencia el 10 de agosto del 2014, dentro del Código Orgánico integral Penal, en el Art 640, precisamente este artículo, es la que concentra todas las etapas del proceso en una sola audiencia, si bien es cierto, se aplica al principio de celeridad, que es un principio rector del derecho, al momento de poner en práctica el procedimiento, aquí es donde se vulnera los derechos fundamentales de un proceso penal al establecer el plazo de hasta 10 días, la realización de la audiencia que se convoca a los sujetos procesales, para resolver la situación jurídica del procesado por lo que en este procedimiento el juez es quien resuelve y emite la sentencia condenatoria o absolutoria, de la misma manera analizaremos a través de encuestas, las preguntas realizadas a los profesionales del derecho, esto es juezas, jueces, fiscales y abogados de la Defensoría Pública.
The present work is directed to carry out an analysis on THE EFFECTIVE TUTELY OF RIGHTS AND THE APPLICATION OF THE DIRECT PROCEDURE ARA LOS PPL: CRS 2 CIUDAD DE GUAYAQUIL, a guardianship that should begin just this Direct Procedure entered into force on August 10, 2014, within of the Comprehensive Criminal Organic Code, in Article 640, precisely this article, is the one that concentrates all the stages of the process in a single hearing, although it is true, it applies to the principle of celerity, which is a guiding principle of law, to At the time of implementing the procedure, this is where the fundamental rights of a criminal process are violated by establishing the term of up to 10 days, the conduct of the hearing that is called to the procedural subjects, to resolve the legal situation of the prosecuted by what in this procedure the judge is the one who resolves and issues the conviction or acquittal, in the same way we will analyze through surveys, the p registers made to legal professionals, that is judges, judges, prosecutors and lawyers of the Public Defender's Office.
The present work is directed to carry out an analysis on THE EFFECTIVE TUTELY OF RIGHTS AND THE APPLICATION OF THE DIRECT PROCEDURE ARA LOS PPL: CRS 2 CIUDAD DE GUAYAQUIL, a guardianship that should begin just this Direct Procedure entered into force on August 10, 2014, within of the Comprehensive Criminal Organic Code, in Article 640, precisely this article, is the one that concentrates all the stages of the process in a single hearing, although it is true, it applies to the principle of celerity, which is a guiding principle of law, to At the time of implementing the procedure, this is where the fundamental rights of a criminal process are violated by establishing the term of up to 10 days, the conduct of the hearing that is called to the procedural subjects, to resolve the legal situation of the prosecuted by what in this procedure the judge is the one who resolves and issues the conviction or acquittal, in the same way we will analyze through surveys, the p registers made to legal professionals, that is judges, judges, prosecutors and lawyers of the Public Defender's Office.
Descripción
Palabras clave
TUTELA, DERECHOS, JUSTICIA, JURISPRUDENCIA, VULNERACIÓN, PROCEDIMIENTO, LEGISLACIÓN.