Vulneración al principio de inocencia en la prisión preventiva solicitada por fiscalía
Fecha
2020-10
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Polìticas
Resumen
La presente tesis denominada “Vulneración al principio de inocencia en la prisión preventiva solicitada por Fiscalía”, tiene como objetivo determinar si existe en efecto una vulneración al principio de presunción de inocencia. En la reforma al art. 534 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal del 2019, manifiesta que es el fiscal quien tiene toda la carga probatoria al momento de fundamentar su solicitud de medida cautelar de prisión preventiva, para que el juez decida sobre esta medida cautelar que se aplicará al procesado, tomando como referencia la pena que se imputa por el presunto delito, dando como resultado una presunción de culpabilidad y no de inocencia, el principio de inocencia se encuentra establecido en la Constitución de la República del Ecuador 2008, Tratados y Convenios Internacionales en materia de Derechos Humanos, salvaguardando la duda a favor del reo. Lastimosamente en nuestro país existe una tendencia marcada a que se ordene como medida cautelar la prisión preventiva en vez de recurrir a otras medidas menos lesivas, causando un efecto equívoco de que si una persona presuntamente cometió un ilícito ya se le tiene que dar automáticamente prisión preventiva para que “haya justicia”, cuando la regla general siempre debe ser la garantía de libertad del procesado, mientras se realice la investigación y se lleve a cabo todo el proceso penal.
This thesis deals with "Violation of the principle of innocence in the preventive detention requested by the Prosecutor's Office". Its objective is to determine if there is indeed a violation of the principle of presumption of innocence or if the measure adopted is reasonable”. Because with the new reform to art. 534 of the COIP in 2019. It tells us that the Prosecutor's Office has all the burden when it comes to substantiating its request so that the Judge can make decisions on the application of preventive detention that would be applied to a defendant, taking as a reference the penalty that was charged. For the alleged crime in this way we would be living a presumption of guilt and not initially innocence referred to in the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador 2008. International treaties and international conventions that protect the doubt in favor of the accused. Unfortunately, in our country there is a marked tendency to order preventive detention as a precautionary measure instead of resorting to other less strict measures, this causes an incorrect effect that if a person allegedly committed a crime, it is already the judge's obligation to order preventive detention. to the accused so that there is justice. When the general rule must always be the guarantee of the freedom of the accused, while the investigation is being carried out and the entire criminal process is carried out, without interference, honoring our new justice system where constitutional rights and principles govern the entire legal system.
This thesis deals with "Violation of the principle of innocence in the preventive detention requested by the Prosecutor's Office". Its objective is to determine if there is indeed a violation of the principle of presumption of innocence or if the measure adopted is reasonable”. Because with the new reform to art. 534 of the COIP in 2019. It tells us that the Prosecutor's Office has all the burden when it comes to substantiating its request so that the Judge can make decisions on the application of preventive detention that would be applied to a defendant, taking as a reference the penalty that was charged. For the alleged crime in this way we would be living a presumption of guilt and not initially innocence referred to in the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador 2008. International treaties and international conventions that protect the doubt in favor of the accused. Unfortunately, in our country there is a marked tendency to order preventive detention as a precautionary measure instead of resorting to other less strict measures, this causes an incorrect effect that if a person allegedly committed a crime, it is already the judge's obligation to order preventive detention. to the accused so that there is justice. When the general rule must always be the guarantee of the freedom of the accused, while the investigation is being carried out and the entire criminal process is carried out, without interference, honoring our new justice system where constitutional rights and principles govern the entire legal system.
Descripción
Palabras clave
PRISIÓN PREVENTIVA, TUTELA JUDICIAL, PRESUNCIÓN DE INOCENCIA, DERECHOS CONSTITUCIONALES, DEBIDO PROCESO, DERECHOS HUMANOS.