Aplicación de la prisión preventiva en delitos sancionados con privación de libertad de hasta cinco años en el Cantón Esmeraldas
Fecha
2021-04
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Polìticas
Resumen
El presente trabajo de investigación, trata sobre la aplicación de la prisión preventiva en los delitos sancionados con privación de libertad de hasta cinco años en el cantón Esmeraldas, lo cual demuestra que en ciertos casos existe inobservancia de los principios de presunción de inocencia, proporcionalidad y necesidad, y abuso en la aplicación de esta medida, por falta de dispositivos de vigilancia electrónica, provocando la vulneración de derechos constitucionales, como el derecho a la defensa, ya que la persona al estar encarcelada bajo esta medida cautelar no puede defenderse en igualdad de condiciones, vulneración al derecho de la presunción de inocencia, por privar de libertad a una persona sin haber sido sentenciada, la norma constitucional en el artículo 77 numeral 1 permite la prisión preventiva para garantizar la comparecencia del imputado al proceso, así como también indica que no será la regla general, por tal razón el articulo 77 numeral 11 de la misma carta magna establece que las juezas y jueces aplicaran las medidas cautelares alternativas a la privación de libertad. Por este motivo se recomienda que el estado cree una reforma de ley para regular la aplicación de la prisión preventiva en estos delitos y provea de suficientes dispositivos de vigilancia electrónica a la función judicial del cantón Esmeradas para disminuir la aplicación indiscriminada de la prisión preventiva, y evitar el hacinamiento en las cárceles. El tipo de investigación que se utilizó en este estudio, fue la investigación cualitativa a través del método inductivo, mediante entrevistas a expertos.
This research work deals with the application of preventive detention in in crimes punishable by deprivation of liberty of up to five years in the Esmeraldas canton, which shows that in certain cases there is non-observance of the principles of presumption of innocence, proportionality and necessity, and abuse in the application of this measure, due to the lack of electronic surveillance devices, causing the violation of constitutional rights, such as the right to defense, since the person being incarcerated under this precautionary measure cannot defend himself on an equal basis conditions, violation of the right of the presumption of innocence, proportionality and necessity, and abuse in the application of this measure, due to the lack of electronic surveillance devices, causing the violation of constitutional rights, such as the right to defense, since the person being incarcerated under this precautionary measure cannot defend himself on an equal basis conditions, violation of the right of the presumption of innocence, for depriving a person of liberty without having been sentenced, the constitutional norm in article 77 numeral 1 allows preventive detention to guarantee the appearance of the accused in the process, as well as indicates that It will not be the general rule, for this reason Article 77 numeral 11 of the same stable Magna Carta It is necessary for the judges to apply alternative precautionary measures to deprivation of liberty. For this reason, it is recommended that the state create a law reform to regulate the application of preventive detention in these crimes and provide sufficient electronic surveillance devices to the judicial function of the Esmeraldas canton to reduce the indiscriminate application of preventive detention, and avoid overcrowding in prisons. The type of research used in this study was qualitative research through the inductive method, through interviews with experts.
This research work deals with the application of preventive detention in in crimes punishable by deprivation of liberty of up to five years in the Esmeraldas canton, which shows that in certain cases there is non-observance of the principles of presumption of innocence, proportionality and necessity, and abuse in the application of this measure, due to the lack of electronic surveillance devices, causing the violation of constitutional rights, such as the right to defense, since the person being incarcerated under this precautionary measure cannot defend himself on an equal basis conditions, violation of the right of the presumption of innocence, proportionality and necessity, and abuse in the application of this measure, due to the lack of electronic surveillance devices, causing the violation of constitutional rights, such as the right to defense, since the person being incarcerated under this precautionary measure cannot defend himself on an equal basis conditions, violation of the right of the presumption of innocence, for depriving a person of liberty without having been sentenced, the constitutional norm in article 77 numeral 1 allows preventive detention to guarantee the appearance of the accused in the process, as well as indicates that It will not be the general rule, for this reason Article 77 numeral 11 of the same stable Magna Carta It is necessary for the judges to apply alternative precautionary measures to deprivation of liberty. For this reason, it is recommended that the state create a law reform to regulate the application of preventive detention in these crimes and provide sufficient electronic surveillance devices to the judicial function of the Esmeraldas canton to reduce the indiscriminate application of preventive detention, and avoid overcrowding in prisons. The type of research used in this study was qualitative research through the inductive method, through interviews with experts.
Descripción
Palabras clave
VULNERACIÓN DE DERECHO, PRISIÓN PREVENTIVA, PRINCIPIO DE PRESUNCIÓN DE INOCENCIA, DERECHO A LA DEFENSA, PENA, PROCESADO.