Análisis Comparativo entre Método Convencional y Manto de Hormigón en Reparación del Canal Chongón-Cerecita-Playas Km. 30 Via a La Costa, Provincia Del Guayas-Ecuador
Fecha
2023-09
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil - Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas y Físicas - Carrera de Ingeniería Civil
Resumen
El presente trabajo de investigación se enfoca en realizar un modelo hidráulico para comparar el comportamiento del hormigón simple y el manto de hormigón en el canal Chongón-Cerecita-Playas km 30 vía a la Costa. Mediante mediciones in situ con el equipo NivuFlow 750 se han obtenido las velocidades medias en los distintos materiales, una vez obtenidas las velocidades se utiliza la ecuación de Manning para despejar la rugosidad. Usando el software HEC-RAS se realizaron modelos con flujo permanente para determinar las velocidades y tipo de flujo en distintos escenarios posibles. Mediante los modelos se concluyó que no existe una gran diferencia en los parámetros hidráulicos entre ambos materiales, en relación al costo el hormigón simple es más económico pero la ventaja del manto de hormigón es la velocidad de instalación y habilitación del canal que son 4 veces menores en comparación al canal con hormigón simple.
The present research work focuses on the development of a hydraulic model to compare the behavior of plain concrete and concrete mantle in the Chongón-Cerecita-Playas canal, km 30 on the coast road. By means of in situ measurements with the NivuFlow 750 equipment, the average velocities in the different materials were obtained. Once the velocities were obtained, the Manning equation was used to clear the roughness. Using the HEC-RAS software, steady flow models were run to determine the velocities and type of flow in different possible scenarios. The models concluded that there is no great difference in the hydraulic parameters between the two materials. In terms of cost, plain concrete is more economical, but the advantage of the concrete mantle is the speed of installation and canal clearance, which are 4 times lower compared to the plain concrete canal.
The present research work focuses on the development of a hydraulic model to compare the behavior of plain concrete and concrete mantle in the Chongón-Cerecita-Playas canal, km 30 on the coast road. By means of in situ measurements with the NivuFlow 750 equipment, the average velocities in the different materials were obtained. Once the velocities were obtained, the Manning equation was used to clear the roughness. Using the HEC-RAS software, steady flow models were run to determine the velocities and type of flow in different possible scenarios. The models concluded that there is no great difference in the hydraulic parameters between the two materials. In terms of cost, plain concrete is more economical, but the advantage of the concrete mantle is the speed of installation and canal clearance, which are 4 times lower compared to the plain concrete canal.
Descripción
pdf
Palabras clave
CANAL, VELOCIDADES, RUGOSIDAD, SIMULACIÓN, COMPARACIÓN
Citación
APA