Comparación de la eficacia en la irrigación de conductos curvos empleando dos tipos de agujas
Archivos
Fecha
2024-03
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil. Facultad Piloto de Odontología
Resumen
El presente trabajo de investigación busca comparar dos diseños de aguja para la irrigación en conductos curvos, IrriFlex y NaviTip, estos diseños de agujas nos permitirán conocer las diferencias que existe entre ambas puntas, la que va se a adaptar mucho mejor a la necesidad de obtener mejores resultados en la terapia endodóntica y consecuentemente facilitar el trabajo del operador, así mismo como aporte al conocimiento referente a los tipos agujas que pueden ser utilizadas en endodoncia. Objetivo: Comparar la eficacia en la irrigación de conductos curvos utilizando dos tipos de agujas, IrriFlex y NaviTip, para la eliminación del barrido dentinario con EDTA en el tercio apical. Materiales y Métodos: se realizó un estudio in-vitro utilizando 30 dientes primeros molares superiores seleccionando la raíz correspondiente al conducto mesiovestibular, se dividieron al azar en tres grupos de estudios de los que constan 10 en cada uno, se seccionaron las coronas e instrumentaron a 12mm de longitud de trabajo, Se irrigó correspondiente a los grupos de trabajo: Grupo Control con Suero fisiológico final, el Grupo A utilizo la aguja IrriFlex y Grupo B la aguja NaviTip para la irrigación con una solución final de EDTA al 17% con 5ml durante 10 minutos, posteriormente fueron analizados cada uno con microfotografías obtenidas del microscopio electrónico de barrido en la que se evaluó una escala del 1 al 4. Conclusión: los resultados determinaron que IrriFlex presento mayor eficacia en la irrigación considerando la eliminación de barrillo dentinario al utilizar EDTA 17% en comparación con la NaviTip.
The present research work seeks to compare two needle designs for irrigation in curved canals, IrriFlex and NaviTip, these needle designs will allow us to know the differences that exist between both tips, which will adapt much better to the need to obtain better results in endodontic therapy and consequently facilitate the work of the operator, as well as a contribution to the knowledge regarding the types of needles that can be used in endodontics. Objective: To compare the efficacy in the irrigation of curved canals using two types of needles, IrriFlex and NaviTip, for the removal of EDTA dentin sweep in the apical third. Materials and Methods: An in-vitro study was carried out using 30 upper first molar teeth selecting the root corresponding to the mesiovestibular canal, they were randomly divided into three study groups of which there were 10 in each one, the crowns were sectioned and instrumented at 12mm working length, irrigated corresponding to the working groups: Control Group with final saline, Group A used the IrriFlex needle and Group B the NaviTip needle for irrigation with a final solution of EDTA 17% with 5ml for 10 minutes, they were subsequently analyzed each with microphotographs obtained from the scanning electron microscope in which a scale from 1 to 4 was evaluated. Conclusion: The results determined that IrriFlex presented greater efficacy in irrigation considering the removal of smear when using EDTA 17% compared to NaviTip.
The present research work seeks to compare two needle designs for irrigation in curved canals, IrriFlex and NaviTip, these needle designs will allow us to know the differences that exist between both tips, which will adapt much better to the need to obtain better results in endodontic therapy and consequently facilitate the work of the operator, as well as a contribution to the knowledge regarding the types of needles that can be used in endodontics. Objective: To compare the efficacy in the irrigation of curved canals using two types of needles, IrriFlex and NaviTip, for the removal of EDTA dentin sweep in the apical third. Materials and Methods: An in-vitro study was carried out using 30 upper first molar teeth selecting the root corresponding to the mesiovestibular canal, they were randomly divided into three study groups of which there were 10 in each one, the crowns were sectioned and instrumented at 12mm working length, irrigated corresponding to the working groups: Control Group with final saline, Group A used the IrriFlex needle and Group B the NaviTip needle for irrigation with a final solution of EDTA 17% with 5ml for 10 minutes, they were subsequently analyzed each with microphotographs obtained from the scanning electron microscope in which a scale from 1 to 4 was evaluated. Conclusion: The results determined that IrriFlex presented greater efficacy in irrigation considering the removal of smear when using EDTA 17% compared to NaviTip.
Descripción
PDF
Palabras clave
ENDODONCIA, IRRIGACION, PRIMER MOLAR