El abuso de la Prisión preventiva frente a la presunción de inocencia en el delito receptación (Caso No. 09281-2019-05976)
Fecha
2021-04
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Polìticas
Resumen
En el presente estudio de caso titulado “El abuso de la prisión preventiva frente a la presunción de inocencia en el delito de receptación (Caso No. 09281-2019-05976)” posee el carácter de relevante para la comunidad jurídica y para toda la sociedad debido a que direcciona el abuso de esta figura en el caso concreto, el mal uso por parte de los administradores de justicia, la falas fundamentación para la aplicación de esta medida por parte del fiscal y los daños provocados al procesado en caso de que se le ratifique el estado de presunción de inocencia. Los objetivos están direccionados al análisis de la figura jurídica de presunción de inocencia y prisión preventiva, la aplicación de esta figura en el caso examinado y la fundamentación de aplicación de las medidas cautelares alternativas a la prisión preventiva. El objeto y campo de acción versan en el análisis del Caso No. 09281-2019-05976 en la aplicación de la medida cautelar de prisión preventiva. El diseño metodológico está compuesto por los métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos, las técnicas son la exploratoria, descriptiva, correlacional, explicativa y la de muestreo, los instrumentos son la entrevista y la encuesta. Como resultado y conclusión se pudo determinar la existencia de un abuso en la aplicación de la prisión preventiva en el Caso No. 09281-2019-05976 al no fundamentar su aplicación y ratificarle su estado de presunción de inocencia al procesado, además que las medidas cautelares alternativas a la prisión preventiva promueven el respeto al derecho a la libertad.
In this case study entitled "The abuse of preventive detention against the presumption of innocence in the crime of reception (Case No. 09281-2019-05976)" has the character of relevant for the legal community and for the whole of society Due to the fact that it addresses the abuse of this figure in the specific case, the misuse by the administrators of justice, the false grounds for the application of this measure by the prosecutor and the damages caused to the accused in the event that he is ratify the state of presumption of innocence. The objectives are directed to the analysis of the legal figure of presumption of innocence and preventive detention, the application of this figure in the case under review and the justification for the application of alternative precautionary measures to preventive detention. The object and field of action are in the analysis of Case No. 09281-2019-05976 in the application of the precautionary measure of preventive detention. The methodological design is composed of qualitative and quantitative methods, the techniques are exploratory, descriptive, correlational, explanatory and sampling, the instruments are the interview and the survey. As a result and conclusion, it was possible to determine the existence of an abuse in the application of preventive detention in Case No. 09281-2019-05976 by not substantiating its application and ratifying the state of presumption of innocence to the accused, in addition to the precautionary measures Alternatives to pretrial detention promote respect for the right to liberty.
In this case study entitled "The abuse of preventive detention against the presumption of innocence in the crime of reception (Case No. 09281-2019-05976)" has the character of relevant for the legal community and for the whole of society Due to the fact that it addresses the abuse of this figure in the specific case, the misuse by the administrators of justice, the false grounds for the application of this measure by the prosecutor and the damages caused to the accused in the event that he is ratify the state of presumption of innocence. The objectives are directed to the analysis of the legal figure of presumption of innocence and preventive detention, the application of this figure in the case under review and the justification for the application of alternative precautionary measures to preventive detention. The object and field of action are in the analysis of Case No. 09281-2019-05976 in the application of the precautionary measure of preventive detention. The methodological design is composed of qualitative and quantitative methods, the techniques are exploratory, descriptive, correlational, explanatory and sampling, the instruments are the interview and the survey. As a result and conclusion, it was possible to determine the existence of an abuse in the application of preventive detention in Case No. 09281-2019-05976 by not substantiating its application and ratifying the state of presumption of innocence to the accused, in addition to the precautionary measures Alternatives to pretrial detention promote respect for the right to liberty.
Descripción
Palabras clave
ABUSO, PRISIÓN PREVENTIVA, MEDIDAS CAUTELARES ALTERNATIVAS, PRESUNCIÓN DE INOCENCIA, DERECHO A LA LIBERTAD.