Diagnóstico de Satisfacción Laboral en C.I.B.V. “Gertrudis de Hahn”, de Fundación “Huerto de los Olivos”, de la ciudad de Guayaquil.
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
2017-09
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil Facultad de Ciencias Psicológicas
Resumen
El documento a continuación es la sistematización de la experiencia resultado de un proceso de evaluación de satisfacción laboral realizado entre los meses de junio a agosto del 2017. Dicho proceso evaluativo formaba parte de un proyecto mayor que involucraba una caracterización organizacional y un análisis ocupacional. El proyecto fue llevado a cabo por estudiantes de la Facultad de Ciencias Psicológicas de la Universidad de Guayaquil y supervisado por tutores de la misma entidad académica. Durante su realización se suscitaron diversas eventualidades, algunas fueron bien sobrellevadas, pero otras obstaculizaron el cumplimiento adecuado del proceso. Producto de esto, la sistematización de experiencias tuvo como eje la metodología aplicada. Con este recuento histórico, se reconocerían los errores cometidos, las causas y los responsables para así poder analizar si hubiesen podido evitarse o no. Al comparar estudios célebres e investigaciones diversas sobre satisfacción laboral con este trabajo, pudieron extraerse los fallos en el proceso y en la metodología aplicada. Por ejemplo, no hubo error en el instrumento usado, pero sí en no cotejar o triangular sus resultados con otras herramientas disponibles.
Se concluye con un recuento de las fallas en la metodología aplicada seguidas de recomendaciones a las mismas, dirigidas principalmente a la discusión sobre el alcance de la responsabilidad de la unidad académica y la responsabilidad que se le debiera dar a los egresados en trabajos de este nivel
process of evaluation of work satisfaction between the months of June to August 2017. This evaluation process was part of a major project that involved an organizational characterization and occupational analysis. The project was carried out by students of the Faculty of Psychological Sciences of the University of Guayaquil and supervised by the same academic entity. During its implementation, a number of eventualities arose, some of which were well-coped but others impeded the proper fulfillment of the process. As a result of this, the systematization of experiences was focused on the methodology applied. With this historical account, the errors committed, the causes and the responsible ones would be recognized so as to be able to analyze if they could have been avoided or not. When comparing well-known studies and diverse investigations on work satisfaction with this work, the errors in the process and in the applied methodology could be extracted. For example, there was no error in the instrument used but in not collating or triangulating its results with other tools available. It concludes with a recount of the flaws in the applied methodology followed by recommendations to the same, mainly directed to the discussion about the scope of the responsibility of the academic unit and the responsibility that should be given to the graduates in works of this level
process of evaluation of work satisfaction between the months of June to August 2017. This evaluation process was part of a major project that involved an organizational characterization and occupational analysis. The project was carried out by students of the Faculty of Psychological Sciences of the University of Guayaquil and supervised by the same academic entity. During its implementation, a number of eventualities arose, some of which were well-coped but others impeded the proper fulfillment of the process. As a result of this, the systematization of experiences was focused on the methodology applied. With this historical account, the errors committed, the causes and the responsible ones would be recognized so as to be able to analyze if they could have been avoided or not. When comparing well-known studies and diverse investigations on work satisfaction with this work, the errors in the process and in the applied methodology could be extracted. For example, there was no error in the instrument used but in not collating or triangulating its results with other tools available. It concludes with a recount of the flaws in the applied methodology followed by recommendations to the same, mainly directed to the discussion about the scope of the responsibility of the academic unit and the responsibility that should be given to the graduates in works of this level
Descripción
PDF
Palabras clave
Sistematización de experiencia, satisfacción laboral, metodología aplicada