Análisis comparativo entre los métodos de zanja abierta y Pipe Bursting en la rehabilitación de tubería de AA.SS de la la Av. Martha B. Roldós E 13R Cjon. 17B y Calle 1era.
No hay miniatura disponible
Archivos
Fecha
2018
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil. Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas y Físicas. Carrera de Ingeniería Civil.
Resumen
En esta comparación se analizó 2 metodologías para la rehabilitación de tuberías, gracias a la información facilitada por le empresa Interagua siendo este el encargado del mantenimiento de las redes de alcantarillado sanitario de la ciudad de Guayaquil.
Se comparó la metodología tradicional y el método pipe bursting en el proyecto
“Rehabilitación de tubería en la “Av. Martha B Roldós entre 1er cjon. 17B NO y calle
1era – Mapasinge Este – Vía a Daule” en donde se instalará 850 metros de tubería y se analizará detalladamente cada proceso considerando las afectaciones sociales, económicas y ambientales de los mismos. La metodología tradicional se ha venido utilizando durante muchos años por Interagua por lo que existe mucha experiencia para este tipo de trabajo, a diferencia del pipe bursting que aún es una metodología poco usada en el país.
Se realizó un análisis para evaluar costos y rendimientos de cada una de las metodologías, evidenciando que la tecnología pipe bursting resulta un 48,61% más económica que la metodología tradicional, ya que el costo por metro lineal de rehabilitación por pipe bursting es de $63.48 y de $123.54 en el método tradicional.
In this comparison, 2 methodologies for the rehabilitation of pipelines were analyzed, thanks to the information provided by the company Interagua, which is responsible for the maintenance of the sanitary sewer networks of the city of Guayaquil. The traditional methodology and the pipe bursting method were compared in the project "Rehabilitation of pipes in the" Av. Martha B Roldós between 1st cjon. 17B NO and 1st street - Mapasinge Este - Via Daule "where 850 meters of pipeline will be installed and each process will be analyzed in detail considering the social, economic and environmental effects of the same. The traditional methodology has been used for many years by Interagua so there is much experience for this type of work, unlike the pipe bursting that is still a little used methodology in the country. An analysis was made to evaluate costs and yields of each of the methodologies, showing that the pipe bursting technology is 48.61% cheaper than the traditional methodology, since the cost per linear meter of rehabilitation by pipe bursting is $ 63.48 and $ 123.54 in the traditional method.
In this comparison, 2 methodologies for the rehabilitation of pipelines were analyzed, thanks to the information provided by the company Interagua, which is responsible for the maintenance of the sanitary sewer networks of the city of Guayaquil. The traditional methodology and the pipe bursting method were compared in the project "Rehabilitation of pipes in the" Av. Martha B Roldós between 1st cjon. 17B NO and 1st street - Mapasinge Este - Via Daule "where 850 meters of pipeline will be installed and each process will be analyzed in detail considering the social, economic and environmental effects of the same. The traditional methodology has been used for many years by Interagua so there is much experience for this type of work, unlike the pipe bursting that is still a little used methodology in the country. An analysis was made to evaluate costs and yields of each of the methodologies, showing that the pipe bursting technology is 48.61% cheaper than the traditional methodology, since the cost per linear meter of rehabilitation by pipe bursting is $ 63.48 and $ 123.54 in the traditional method.
Descripción
Adobe PDF
Palabras clave
PIPE BURSTING., ZANJA ABIERTA, ALCANTARILLADO, REHABILITACIÓN, TUBERÍAS