Ventajas y desventajas en la colecistectomía laparoscópica
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
2018
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Carrera de Medicina
Resumen
La cirugía abierta ha sido el abordaje inicial d la colecistitis aguda sin embargo las complicaciones postquirúrgicas han hecho que pierda su paso frente a la de tipo laparoscópica, Antes bien esta última ha demostrado menor cantidad de complicaciones y menor estancia hospitalaria que la hace superar a su rival tradicional.
Frente a esta divergencia entre abordajes es necesario establecer cuáles son algunas de las principales ventajas de cada una en lo que tiene que ver con la otra y a qué tipo de pacientes puede ser aplicado.
No todos los pacientes presentan la misma disponibilidad ni tiempo del cuadro para la aplicación de esta técnica. sin embargo, saber cuáles son las ventajas de cada una de ella podría darnos una guía para su aplicación. Por eso es importante diferenciar las ventajas de una técnica y las desventajas de la otra; a fin de poder darles una aplicación.
Open surgery has been the initial approach of acute cholecystitis, however postsurgical complications have made it lose its pace compared to the laparoscopic type, rather the latter has shown fewer complications and a shorter hospital stay that makes it exceed its traditional rival Faced with this divergence between approaches, it is necessary to establish what are some of the main advantages of each in what has to do with the other and to what type of patients can be applied. Not all patients have the same availability or time of the table for the application of this technique. However, knowing what the advantages of each of them are could give us a guide for its application. That is why it is important to differentiate the advantages of one technique and the disadvantages of the other; in order to be able to give them an application
Open surgery has been the initial approach of acute cholecystitis, however postsurgical complications have made it lose its pace compared to the laparoscopic type, rather the latter has shown fewer complications and a shorter hospital stay that makes it exceed its traditional rival Faced with this divergence between approaches, it is necessary to establish what are some of the main advantages of each in what has to do with the other and to what type of patients can be applied. Not all patients have the same availability or time of the table for the application of this technique. However, knowing what the advantages of each of them are could give us a guide for its application. That is why it is important to differentiate the advantages of one technique and the disadvantages of the other; in order to be able to give them an application
Descripción
PDF
Palabras clave
Colecistectomía laparoscópica, Hospital IESS Los Ceibos, Cantón Guayaquil, Ecuador, Estudios retrospectivos, Epidemiología descriptiva, Registros médicos