Estudio de contaje de leucocitos en sistemas tomatizados versus método convencional en líquidos corporales (sinovial, pleural, peritoneal y líquido céfalo raquídeo LFR) en el Laboratorio Clínico del Hospital Luis Vernaza durante los meses de enero 2014 a mayo 2014
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
2014
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Carrera de Tecnología Médica
Resumen
El análisis de líquidos biológicos es una importante ayuda en el diagnóstico y seguimiento de diversas patologías. La mayoría de laboratorios utilizan métodos manuales para realizar el recuento celular, pero es conocida la considerable imprecisión de que adolecen dichos métodos, incluso si se con personal experimentado. En el laboratorio se puede tener un fluido muy claro y decidir procesarlo directamente o un fluido un poco turbio y decidir hacer una dilución 1 a 10 y leerlo en la cámara, pero cuando se obtienen los resultados se puede llegar a considerar que se debió diluirlo más, este proceso manual depende mucho del criterio técnico del profesional, e incluso se pueden llegar a cometer errores matemáticos de cálculo. El Colegio Americano de Patólogos enfatiza queen el laboratorio se debe tener un procedimiento, que basado en cuántas células se observan en el cuadro de la cámara, especifique qué área de la cámara se debe contar. La automatización del conteo da una mejor precisión, ya que si un fluido corporal se procesa 10 veces, el mismo resultado se dará en esas 10 veces. Esto no sucede si el mismo fluido lo procesan 10 tecnólogos o analistas diferentes. Otra ventaja de automatizar es la considerable disminución del tiempo de entrega de los resultados. El equipo automático hace un diferencial de dos partes, que es algo nuevo en los fluidos corporales, separa las células mononucleares de las polimorfonucleares. El diferencial del instrumento es un buen control de calidad para el diferencial que se prepara en la cito centrífuga. Procesar los fluidos de forma automática es mucho más seguro, rápido, fácil, eficiente, exacto y preciso que hacerlo de forma manual.
The analysis of biological fluids is an important aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of various pathologies. Most laboratories use manual methods to perform cell counts, but the considerable inaccuracy of such methods is known, even if experienced personnel are present. In the laboratory you can have a very clear fluid and decide to process it directly or a slightly cloudy fluid and decide to make a dilution 1 to 10 and read it in the chamber, but when you get the results you can consider that it should have been diluted more This manual process depends a lot on the technical criteria of the professional, and even mathematical calculation errors can be made. The American College of Pathologists emphasizes that the laboratory should have a procedure, which based on how many cells are observed in the camera frame, specifies which area of the chamber should be counted. Counting automation gives better accuracy, since if a body fluid is processed 10 times, the same result will occur in those 10 times. This does not happen if the same fluid is processed by 10 different technologists or analysts. Another advantage of automating is the considerable decrease in the delivery time of the results. The automatic equipment makes a two-part differential, which is something new in body fluids, separates the mononuclear cells from the polymorphonuclear cells. The instrument differential is a good quality control for the differential that is prepared in the centrifugal quote. Processing fluids automatically is much safer, faster, easier, more efficient, accurate and precise than doing it manually.
The analysis of biological fluids is an important aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of various pathologies. Most laboratories use manual methods to perform cell counts, but the considerable inaccuracy of such methods is known, even if experienced personnel are present. In the laboratory you can have a very clear fluid and decide to process it directly or a slightly cloudy fluid and decide to make a dilution 1 to 10 and read it in the chamber, but when you get the results you can consider that it should have been diluted more This manual process depends a lot on the technical criteria of the professional, and even mathematical calculation errors can be made. The American College of Pathologists emphasizes that the laboratory should have a procedure, which based on how many cells are observed in the camera frame, specifies which area of the chamber should be counted. Counting automation gives better accuracy, since if a body fluid is processed 10 times, the same result will occur in those 10 times. This does not happen if the same fluid is processed by 10 different technologists or analysts. Another advantage of automating is the considerable decrease in the delivery time of the results. The automatic equipment makes a two-part differential, which is something new in body fluids, separates the mononuclear cells from the polymorphonuclear cells. The instrument differential is a good quality control for the differential that is prepared in the centrifugal quote. Processing fluids automatically is much safer, faster, easier, more efficient, accurate and precise than doing it manually.
Descripción
PDF
Palabras clave
Fluido corporal, Líquidos corporales, Células, Hospital Luis Vernaza, Cantón Guayaquil, Ecuador