La errónea ponderación de derechos fundamentales, en acciones de protección propuestas contra Comunas, aplicado al caso Familia Jarrín-Viteri vs. Comuna Montañita
Fecha
2019-09
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Políticas
Resumen
Por lo general los ciudadanos que se sienten afectados en derechos subjetivos, recurren al amparo del sistema de justicia en el Ecuador, una de las materias tuteladas, es la constitucional, esta sin embargo, se ha visto abusada en cuanto a las demandas de acción de protección, ya que, por su naturaleza es la llamada a cubrir aquellos casos no cubiertos por procedimiento preconcebidos. En el desarrollo de esta investigación veremos como la protección constitucional de la acción estudiada, no surte efectos reales cuando es propuesta contra comunas, esto según analizaremos el caso pertinente, tiene génesis en la errónea valoración de los derechos de la comuna, que equivocadamente se dicen superiores en todo sentido, aunque la propia norma supra legal establece lo contrario. Esta aplicación indebida de la ponderación de derechos de la comuna ha impedido que la institución jurídica estudiada cumpla con el fin de tutelar efectivamente derechos fundamentales de los accionantes, sobre todo cuando son ciudadanos comunes.
In general, citizens who feel affected by subjective rights, resort to the protection of the justice system in Ecuador, one of the matters protected, is the constitutional one, however, it has been abused as regards the demands for action of protection, since, by its nature, it is the call to cover those cases not covered by preconceived procedures. In the development of this investigation we will see how the constitutional protection of the action studied, does not have real effects when it is proposed against communes, this as we will analyze the relevant case, has genesis in the erroneous assessment of the rights of the commune, which are mistakenly said superior in every way, although the supra legal rule stipulates otherwise. This improper application of the weighting of rights of the commune has prevented the legal institution studied from complying with the purpose of effectively protecting fundamental rights of the shareholders, especially when they are ordinary citizens.
In general, citizens who feel affected by subjective rights, resort to the protection of the justice system in Ecuador, one of the matters protected, is the constitutional one, however, it has been abused as regards the demands for action of protection, since, by its nature, it is the call to cover those cases not covered by preconceived procedures. In the development of this investigation we will see how the constitutional protection of the action studied, does not have real effects when it is proposed against communes, this as we will analyze the relevant case, has genesis in the erroneous assessment of the rights of the commune, which are mistakenly said superior in every way, although the supra legal rule stipulates otherwise. This improper application of the weighting of rights of the commune has prevented the legal institution studied from complying with the purpose of effectively protecting fundamental rights of the shareholders, especially when they are ordinary citizens.
Descripción
Palabras clave
ACCIÓN DE PROTECCIÓN, DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES, COLISIÓN DE DERECHOS, DERECHO COMUNAS, PROYECTO REFORMAS.