La acción extraordinaria de protección como Garantía Jurisdiccional ciudadana frente a la vulneración del derecho a la tutela efectiva, (caso Montaño Galarza vs CES)
Fecha
2019-03
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Políticas
Resumen
La presente investigación, se desarrolla sobre la temática titulada “La acción extraordinaria de protección como garantía jurisdiccional frente a la vulneración de la tutela judicial efectiva, relacionada con el estudio del caso Montaño Galarza vs CES”, centrada en el paradigma positivista, con enfoque cuantitativo. Igualmente se empleó como métodos de investigación el hipotético Deductivo y lógico inductivo, lo que permitió la realización de los diferentes análisis en base a la información recolectada. Por consiguiente, el estudio tuvo como resultado la determinación mediante los análisis realizados que se vulneró el derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva durante el proceso de aplicación de la garantía de jurisdiccional. Al respecto, se pudo evidenciar que la existencia de las garantías jurisdiccionales no es suficiente sino existe un debido control sobre el desarrollo del proceso de ejecución de las medidas de protección, y por ende la relevancia de ejercer apropiadamente la tutela judicial efectiva es un derecho de cualquier ciudadano que sienta que sus derechos han sido vulnerados durante el desarrollo de un procedimiento judicial. En este sentido, se considera importante realizar los análisis necesarios sobre los casos en los cuales se evidencia la ausencia de una motivación eficazmente sustanciada que garantice la naturaleza de la cuestión para el cumplimiento de los derechos constitucionales. De allí, la importancia de revisar los casos que no responda a las pretensiones del accionante en cuanto al ejercicio de sus derechos, vulnerados éstos, bien sea por la acción u omisión evidenciada en una sentencia o auto definitivo y por tanto genere la aplicación de la Acción Extraordinaria de protección.
The present investigation is developed on the theme entitled “The extraordinary protection action as a jurisdictional guarantee against the violation of effective judicial protection, related to the study of the Montaño Galarza vs. CES case”, focused on the positivist paradigm, with a quantitative approach Likewise, the hypothetical Deductive and inductive logic were used as research methods, which allowed the different analyzes to be carried out based on the information collected. Consequently, the study resulted in the determination by means of the analyzes performed that the right to effective judicial protection was violated during the jurisdictional guarantee application process. In this regard, it could be evidenced that the existence of jurisdictional guarantees is not sufficient but there is due control over the development of the process of implementing protection measures, and therefore the relevance of properly exercising effective judicial protection is a right of Any citizen who feels that their rights have been violated during the development of a judicial proceeding. In this sense, it is considered important to carry out the necessary analyzes on the cases in which the absence of an effectively substantiated motivation that guarantees the nature of the issue for the fulfillment of constitutional rights is evidenced. From there, the importance of reviewing cases that do not respond to the claims of the acquiring party regarding the exercise of their rights, violated these, either by the action or omission evidenced in a final judgment or order and therefore generate the application of the Extraordinary protection action.
The present investigation is developed on the theme entitled “The extraordinary protection action as a jurisdictional guarantee against the violation of effective judicial protection, related to the study of the Montaño Galarza vs. CES case”, focused on the positivist paradigm, with a quantitative approach Likewise, the hypothetical Deductive and inductive logic were used as research methods, which allowed the different analyzes to be carried out based on the information collected. Consequently, the study resulted in the determination by means of the analyzes performed that the right to effective judicial protection was violated during the jurisdictional guarantee application process. In this regard, it could be evidenced that the existence of jurisdictional guarantees is not sufficient but there is due control over the development of the process of implementing protection measures, and therefore the relevance of properly exercising effective judicial protection is a right of Any citizen who feels that their rights have been violated during the development of a judicial proceeding. In this sense, it is considered important to carry out the necessary analyzes on the cases in which the absence of an effectively substantiated motivation that guarantees the nature of the issue for the fulfillment of constitutional rights is evidenced. From there, the importance of reviewing cases that do not respond to the claims of the acquiring party regarding the exercise of their rights, violated these, either by the action or omission evidenced in a final judgment or order and therefore generate the application of the Extraordinary protection action.
Descripción
Palabras clave
GARANTÍAS JURISDICCIONALES, TUTELA JUDICIAL EFECTIVA , DEBIDO PROCESO, ACCIÓN EXTRAORDINARIA DE PROTECCIÓN.