Vulneración de los derechos constitucionales del debido proceso y tutela judicial efectiva al señor César Eduardo Montaño Galarza
Fecha
2020-06
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Polìticas
Resumen
Este trabajo de investigaciòn analiza el caso del doctor Cèsar Montaño Galarza, quien fue elegido como rector de la Universidad andina Simòn Bolívar y la forma en que sus derechos constitucionales fueron violentados por una resoluciòn del Consejo de Educaciòn Superior. El doctor Montaño por medio de una acciòn constitucional de protecciòn intenta parar esta violaciòn, pero por el juez a quo niega esta peticiòn la cual es apelada, y los señores jueces de la Corte Provincial vuelven a negar la acciòn. Se plantea entonces una acciòn constitucional extraordinaria de protecciòn y son los señores jueces de la Corte Constitucional quienes luego de un exhaustivo estudio declaran la vulneraciòn de derechos y ordenan de reparaciòn integral a favor del accionante. Analizaremos la sentencia emitida por la corte constitucional para entender còmo estos jueces llegan a la conclusiòn de que los derechos constitucionales del doctor Montaño fueron vulnerado
This research work analyzes the case of doctor Cèsar Montaño Galarza, who was elected as rector of the Simòn Bolívar Andean University and the way in which his constitutional rights were violated by a resolution of the Higher Education Council. Dr. Montaño by means of a constitutional protection action tries to stop this violation, but by the judge who denies this petition which is appealed, and the judges of the Provincial Court once again deny the action. An extraordinary constitutional protection action is then proposed and it is the judges of the Constitutional Court who after an exhaustive study declare the violation of rights and order comprehensive reparation in favor of the plaintiff. We will analyze the sentence issued by the constitutional court to understand how these judges come to the conclusion that the constitutional rights of Dr. Montaño were violated
This research work analyzes the case of doctor Cèsar Montaño Galarza, who was elected as rector of the Simòn Bolívar Andean University and the way in which his constitutional rights were violated by a resolution of the Higher Education Council. Dr. Montaño by means of a constitutional protection action tries to stop this violation, but by the judge who denies this petition which is appealed, and the judges of the Provincial Court once again deny the action. An extraordinary constitutional protection action is then proposed and it is the judges of the Constitutional Court who after an exhaustive study declare the violation of rights and order comprehensive reparation in favor of the plaintiff. We will analyze the sentence issued by the constitutional court to understand how these judges come to the conclusion that the constitutional rights of Dr. Montaño were violated
Descripción
Palabras clave
DERECHO,VULNERACIÒN, CONSTITUCIÒN