Anàlisis de aplicaciòn de la Constituciòn en la Acciòn de Protecciòn Nº09209-2019-00434, violentando los derechos a la estabilidad laboral de las personas con discapacidad bajo el Règimen de la Losep
Fecha
2020-10
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Polìticas
Resumen
En este estudio del caso, se analizará una problemática muy concurrente en la
presentación de una acción de protección realizada por una persona con discapacidad,
particularmente, cuando se dicta la sentencia por el Juez Constitucional, a sabiendas
que cuenta con una garantía jurisdiccional que le ratifica el auxilio inmediato y eficaz de
sus derechos constitucionales.
Este grupo de atención prioritaria ha sido históricamente relegado, invisibilizado,
excluido, negándoles el derecho a la educación, a la salud y al trabajo digno que cubra
sus necesidades básicas y elementales. Desde el 2008, cuando se aprobó la
Constitución de la República en Montecristi, reconoce al trabajo como un derecho
fundamental para la inclusión de las personas con discapacidad y como un medio para
alcanzar una mejora en su vida familiar.
En este contexto, se busca analizar el criterio que ha utilizado el juez
constitucional para resolver una acción de protección planteada por un servidor público
que tiene una discapacidad física del 30%, alegando que ha sido vulnerado su derecho
constitucional al trabajo por más de 10 años continuos a través de contratos ocasionales.
El presente estudio del caso, en su parte inicial, procura dirigir el derecho a la
igualdad y a la no discriminación, con un énfasis jurídico al acceso al trabajo en igualdad
de oportunidades y a un estipendio como un elemento para lograr una vida digna.
Por este motivo, se utilizará la doctrina más importante y relevante que menciona
la igualdad y la no discriminación, acceder a un trabajo digno y bien remunerado, así
como las disposiciones constitucionales ecuatorianas y otras contenidas en los Acuerdos
16
internacionales de derechos humanos que el Ecuador ha firmado y ratificado para este
grupo de atención prioritaria.
Posteriormente, se procederá a estudiar la sentencia que ha sido dictada por el
Juez Constitucional en primera instancia, en la acción de protección presentada,
motivando la vulneración al derecho al trabajo. Para ello, se revisará los criterios más
recientes emitidos por la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador y establecer cuáles son los
criterios que ha utilizado el juez al momento de determinar dicho fallo.
Finalmente se incluirá el problema jurídico y se plantearán las conclusiones y
recomendaciones, a las que ha llegado la presente investigación.
In this case study, a very concurrent problem will be discussed in the filing of an action for protection by a person with a disability, particularly when the judgment is handed down by the Constitutional Judge, knowing that it has a judicial guarantee that confirms the immediate and effective assistance of his constitutional rights. This priority focus group has historically been relegated, unvisitable, excluded, denying them the right to education, health and decent work that meets their basic and basic needs. Since 2008, when the Constitution of the Republic was approved in Montecristi, it has recognized work asafundamental right for the inclusion of persons with disabilities and as a means of achieving an improvement in their family life. a Constitution of the Republic a In this context, it seeks to analyze the criterion used by the constitutional court to resolve a protective action raised by a public servant with a physical disability of 30%, claiming that his constitutional right to work has been violated for more than 10 continuous years through occasional contracts. This case study, in its initial part, seeks to address the right to equality and nondiscrimination, with a legal emphasis on access to work on equal opportunities and a stipend as an element in achieving a dignified life. For this reason, the most important and relevant doctrine that refers to equality and non-discrimination, access to decent and well-paid work, as well as Ecuadorian and other constitutional provisions contained in the International Human Rights Agreements signed and ratified by Ecuador for this priority focus group will be used. 18 Subsequently, the judgment given by the Constitutional Judge at first instance, in the protection action brought, will be motived la examined, causing the infringement of the right to work. To this end, the most recent criteria issued by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador will be reviewed and the criteria used by the judge when determining such a ruling will be reviewed. Finally, the legal problem will be included, and the conclusions and recommendations reached in this investigation will be made
In this case study, a very concurrent problem will be discussed in the filing of an action for protection by a person with a disability, particularly when the judgment is handed down by the Constitutional Judge, knowing that it has a judicial guarantee that confirms the immediate and effective assistance of his constitutional rights. This priority focus group has historically been relegated, unvisitable, excluded, denying them the right to education, health and decent work that meets their basic and basic needs. Since 2008, when the Constitution of the Republic was approved in Montecristi, it has recognized work asafundamental right for the inclusion of persons with disabilities and as a means of achieving an improvement in their family life. a Constitution of the Republic a In this context, it seeks to analyze the criterion used by the constitutional court to resolve a protective action raised by a public servant with a physical disability of 30%, claiming that his constitutional right to work has been violated for more than 10 continuous years through occasional contracts. This case study, in its initial part, seeks to address the right to equality and nondiscrimination, with a legal emphasis on access to work on equal opportunities and a stipend as an element in achieving a dignified life. For this reason, the most important and relevant doctrine that refers to equality and non-discrimination, access to decent and well-paid work, as well as Ecuadorian and other constitutional provisions contained in the International Human Rights Agreements signed and ratified by Ecuador for this priority focus group will be used. 18 Subsequently, the judgment given by the Constitutional Judge at first instance, in the protection action brought, will be motived la examined, causing the infringement of the right to work. To this end, the most recent criteria issued by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador will be reviewed and the criteria used by the judge when determining such a ruling will be reviewed. Finally, the legal problem will be included, and the conclusions and recommendations reached in this investigation will be made
Descripción
Palabras clave
VULNERACIÒN, PERSONA CON DISCAPACIDAD, ENTIDADES PÙBLICAS, SENTENCIA, TRABAJO