La aplicación excepcional de la prisión preventiva y la vulneración al artículo 77,11 CRE
Fecha
2022-09
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Políticas
Resumen
Este trabajo de estudio de caso trata sobre el análisis del caso número 0421-14-JH, el cual fue revisado por la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador y producto de esta revisión la Corte emite sentencia, la cual tiene como número el 001-18-PJO-CC. El caso en cuestión trata sobre la detención de los cónyuges Juan Manuel Anrango Tocagón y Virginia Anrango Vásquez y la orden de prisión preventiva sobrevenida contra ellos, orden dictada por la Unidad Judicial Penal y Tránsito de Santo Domingo, para que así su defensora técnica la doctora Vilma Marcela Andrade Gavilánez presente una acción de hábeas corpus a su favor para que estos recuperen su libertad, sin embargo, la Sala Multicompetente de la Corte Provincial de Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas rechazó esta acción por cuanto la consideraron improcedente por no registrase vulneración a ningún derecho constitucional, a lo cual la defensora técnica interpone recurso de apelación contra esta decisión, lo que genera que el caso llegue a conocimiento de la Sala de la Familia, Niñez, Adolescencia y Adolescentes Infractores de la Corte Nacional de Justicia y esta Sala resuelve mediante sentencia revocar la sentencia que antecede y aceptar la acción de hábeas corpus presentada por cuanto se verificó que se vulneró el derecho a la libertad de los cónyuges, a lo cual esta Sala ordena la liberación inmediata de los mismos y la aplicación de medidas cautelares alternativas a la prisión preventiva.
This case study paper deals with the analysis of case number 0421-14-JH, which was reviewed by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador and because of this review the Court issues a sentence, which has number 001-18-PJO-CC. The case in question deals with the detention of the spouses Juan Manuel Anrango Tocagón and Virginia Anrango Vásquez and the order of preventive detention issued against them, an order issued by the Criminal and Traffic Judicial Unit of Santo Domingo, so that their technical defender, Dr. Vilma Marcela Andrade Gavilánez files a hábeas corpus action in their favor so that they can regain their freedom, however, the Multicompetent Chamber of the Provincial Court of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas rejected this action because they considered it inadmissible for not registering a violation of any constitutional right, to which the technical defender files an appeal against this decision, which generates that the case comes to the attention of the Family, Childhood, Adolescence and Adolescent Offenders Chamber of the National Court of Justice and this Chamber resolves through a sentence to revoke the sentence foregoing and accept the hábeas corpus action filed because it was verified that the right to freedom of the spouses was violated, to which this Chamber orders their immediate release and the application of alternative precautionary measures to preventive detention.
This case study paper deals with the analysis of case number 0421-14-JH, which was reviewed by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador and because of this review the Court issues a sentence, which has number 001-18-PJO-CC. The case in question deals with the detention of the spouses Juan Manuel Anrango Tocagón and Virginia Anrango Vásquez and the order of preventive detention issued against them, an order issued by the Criminal and Traffic Judicial Unit of Santo Domingo, so that their technical defender, Dr. Vilma Marcela Andrade Gavilánez files a hábeas corpus action in their favor so that they can regain their freedom, however, the Multicompetent Chamber of the Provincial Court of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas rejected this action because they considered it inadmissible for not registering a violation of any constitutional right, to which the technical defender files an appeal against this decision, which generates that the case comes to the attention of the Family, Childhood, Adolescence and Adolescent Offenders Chamber of the National Court of Justice and this Chamber resolves through a sentence to revoke the sentence foregoing and accept the hábeas corpus action filed because it was verified that the right to freedom of the spouses was violated, to which this Chamber orders their immediate release and the application of alternative precautionary measures to preventive detention.
Descripción
Palabras clave
HÁBEAS CORPUS, PRISIÓN PREVENTIVA, MEDIDAS CAUTELARES ALTERNATIVAS, RECURSO DE APELACIÓN E IMPROCEDENCIA.