La pericia de propiedad intelectual como elemento sustancial para la comprobación del artículo 208A COIP
Fecha
2022-09
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Polìticas
Resumen
El presente trabajo tuvo por objeto general “Identificar a la pericia en materia de propiedad
intelectual como instrumento base para el análisis de los elementos objetivos de delitos de
propiedad intelectual, detallados en el art. 208A del Código Orgánico Integral Penal
(COIP)”, para lo cual fue útil definir los delitos de propiedad intelectual reconocidos en el
Ecuador, las técnicas periciales existentes y las falencias dentro del sistema pericial en esta
materia. Lo mencionado se abarcó por medio de un estudio metodológico no experimental
trasversal propio de las ciencias sociales, con enfoque cualitativo y nivel exploratorio por
su novedad jurídica, que empleó como técnicas cualitativas documentales basadas en fuente
primarias, dicho sea de paso, la revisión de pericias y realización de entrevistas a
profesionales y fuentes secundarias como lo es la revisión de la norma a nivel nacional y
con base al derecho comparado. De ello se puso obtener como resultado que la pericia de
propiedad intelectual es requisito fundamental para la comprobación del ilícito penal
detallado en el art. 208A COIP, llevando a la conclusión de en Ecuador se necesita
incrementar el rango de profesionalización en PI.
The general purpose of this work was to “Identify expertise in intellectual property matters as a basic instrument for the analysis of the objective elements of intellectual property crimes, detailed in art. 208A of the Organic Comprehensive Criminal Code (COIP)”, for which it was useful to define the intellectual property crimes recognized in Ecuador, the existing expert techniques and the shortcomings within the expert system in this matter. The aforementioned was covered by means of a cross-sectional non-experimental methodological study typical of the social sciences, with a qualitative approach and an exploratory level due to its legal novelty, which used as documentary qualitative techniques based on primary sources, incidentally, the review of expert and conducting interviews with professionals and secondary sources such as the review of the standard at the national level and based on comparative law. From this, it was possible to obtain as a result that the intellectual property expertise is a fundamental requirement for the verification of the criminal offense detailed in art. 208A COIP, leading to the conclusion that in Ecuador it is necessary to increase the range of professionalization in IP.
The general purpose of this work was to “Identify expertise in intellectual property matters as a basic instrument for the analysis of the objective elements of intellectual property crimes, detailed in art. 208A of the Organic Comprehensive Criminal Code (COIP)”, for which it was useful to define the intellectual property crimes recognized in Ecuador, the existing expert techniques and the shortcomings within the expert system in this matter. The aforementioned was covered by means of a cross-sectional non-experimental methodological study typical of the social sciences, with a qualitative approach and an exploratory level due to its legal novelty, which used as documentary qualitative techniques based on primary sources, incidentally, the review of expert and conducting interviews with professionals and secondary sources such as the review of the standard at the national level and based on comparative law. From this, it was possible to obtain as a result that the intellectual property expertise is a fundamental requirement for the verification of the criminal offense detailed in art. 208A COIP, leading to the conclusion that in Ecuador it is necessary to increase the range of professionalization in IP.
Descripción
Palabras clave
PERICIA; PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL; PRUEBA TASADA; DELITOS CONTRA DERECHOS DE AUTOR.