El derecho de repetición como mecanismo jurídico de reparación social: análisis de viabilidad en la legislación ecuatoriana.
Fecha
2022-09
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Polìticas
Resumen
Cuando se dan vulneraciones a los derechos humanos en el marco de las instituciones públicas, el
Estado es el responsable inmediato, y la Constitución señala que está obligado a reparar de manera
integral e inmediata a la persona o grupo afectado. Una parte de la reparación es la indemnización,
es decir, una compensación económica. Sin embargo, el dinero que otorga el Estado a la víctima
es el dinero de todos los ecuatorianos, pues para su pago inmediato lo que se hace es retirar el
dinero de las arcas fiscales, restando presupuesto para otras áreas importantes como educación,
salud, etc. En este contexto, el Derecho de repetición consiste en que el Estado a través de sus
autoridades, promueva un juicio donde se condene al servidor público que efectivamente ocasionó
la vulneración de derechos, y sea solo este como verdadero responsable, el encargado de reparar a
la víctima, y en el aspecto económico el Estado ecuatoriano no perdería presupuesto importante
que podría canalizar a otras áreas.
When human rights violations occur within the framework of public institutions, the State isimmediately responsible, and the Constitution statesthat it is obliged to make full and immediate reparations to the affected person or group. Part of the reparation is compensation, i.e., economic compensation. However, the money given by the State to the victim is the money of all Ecuadorians, because for immediate payment what is done is to withdraw the money from the fiscal coffers, subtracting budget for other important areas such as education, health, etc. In this context, the Right of repetition consists of the State, through its Attorney General, promoting a trial where the public servant who effectively caused the violation of rights is condemned, and it is only this person, as the one truly responsible, who is in charge of repairing the victim, and in the economic aspect, the Ecuadorian State would not lose important budget that could be channeled to other areas.
When human rights violations occur within the framework of public institutions, the State isimmediately responsible, and the Constitution statesthat it is obliged to make full and immediate reparations to the affected person or group. Part of the reparation is compensation, i.e., economic compensation. However, the money given by the State to the victim is the money of all Ecuadorians, because for immediate payment what is done is to withdraw the money from the fiscal coffers, subtracting budget for other important areas such as education, health, etc. In this context, the Right of repetition consists of the State, through its Attorney General, promoting a trial where the public servant who effectively caused the violation of rights is condemned, and it is only this person, as the one truly responsible, who is in charge of repairing the victim, and in the economic aspect, the Ecuadorian State would not lose important budget that could be channeled to other areas.
Descripción
Palabras clave
DERECHO, REPETICIÓN, RESPONSABILIDAD. SERVIDORES PÚBLICOS.