Subsunción del delito de enriquecimiento privado no justificado en el lavado de activos
Fecha
2023-03
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Polìticas
Resumen
En el presente trabajo de investigación se examina la problemática jurídica existente provocado
por el populismo penal, en este sentido, se ha denotado que el Delito de Enriquecimiento privado
no justificado es una consecuencia de este último. A partir de ahí se desprende el estudio de la
estructura típica del delito de Enriquecimiento privado no justificado entorno al verdadero alcance
de su aplicación y su relación o más bien semejanza con el Lavado de activos con la finalidad de
establecer perspectivas que posibiliten una correcta subsunción entre ambos tipos penales. Para
la consecución de este análisis, se desarrolló a partir del enfoque cualitativo, utilizando métodos
como: el histórico-lógico, inductivo, analítico-sintético y, por último, el Derecho Comparado, con
el objetivo de compilar todas las características y comportamientos de los delitos de
Enriquecimiento privado no justificado y Lavado de activos. Entre los resultados alcanzados se
pudo comprobar que el tipo penal de Lavado de activos tipificado en el artículo 317 del Código
Orgánico Integral Penal, subsume la conducta descrita en el artículo 297 referente al
Enriquecimiento privado no justificado.
Is this research work examines the existing legal problem caused by criminal populism, in this sense, it has been denoted that the crime of unjustified private enrichment is a consequence of the latter. From there follows the study of the typical structure od the crime of unjustified private enrichment environment to the true of its application and its relationship or rather similarity with money laun dering in order to establish perspectives that allow a correct subsumption between both types of crime. To achieve this analysis, it was developed from the qualitative approach, using methods such as: historical-logical, inductive, analytical-synthetic and, finally, Comparative Law, with the aim of compiling all the characteristics and behaviors of the crimes of Unjustified Private Enrichment and Money Laundering. Among the results achieved it was possible to verify that the criminal type of money laundering typified in article 317 of the Organic Integral Criminal Code, subsumes the conduct described in article 297 referring to unjustified private enrichment.
Is this research work examines the existing legal problem caused by criminal populism, in this sense, it has been denoted that the crime of unjustified private enrichment is a consequence of the latter. From there follows the study of the typical structure od the crime of unjustified private enrichment environment to the true of its application and its relationship or rather similarity with money laun dering in order to establish perspectives that allow a correct subsumption between both types of crime. To achieve this analysis, it was developed from the qualitative approach, using methods such as: historical-logical, inductive, analytical-synthetic and, finally, Comparative Law, with the aim of compiling all the characteristics and behaviors of the crimes of Unjustified Private Enrichment and Money Laundering. Among the results achieved it was possible to verify that the criminal type of money laundering typified in article 317 of the Organic Integral Criminal Code, subsumes the conduct described in article 297 referring to unjustified private enrichment.
Descripción
Palabras clave
POPULISMO PENAL, SUBSUNCIÓN, AUMENTO PATRIMONIAL, INJUSTIFICADO.