Análisis del articulo 137 inciso noveno del Código Orgánico General de Procesos Ecuador
Fecha
2023-03
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Políticas
Resumen
Esta investigación se basa en el análisis crítico del noveno inciso del artículo 137 del Código Orgánico General de Procesos, norma adjetiva que regula el procedimiento en los casos de pensiones alimenticias. Además, la investigación recoge casos específicos de la actualidad en los cuales se evidencia la dicotomía argumentativa y práctica de la aplicación discrecional y no discrecional del artículo mencionado el cual establece como requisito sine qua non el pago total de la deuda generada por incumplimiento de pago de pensiones alimenticias a fin de que el alimentante recupere la libertad de la que ha sido privado por ejecución de apremio personal. Esta investigación explica la imposibilidad jurídica, lógica y práctica de que esto suceda en la realidad. No se ignora que hay casos aislados en donde sí se evidencia dicho acto, pero aquellos casos obedecen a la única razón de que la deuda es ínfima, no así aquellos casos en que la deuda asciende a más de 10 salarios básicos. Se desarrolla con una metodología mixta que involucra trabajo de campo y un acercamiento a magistrados expertos en el área de estudio y preguntas a profesionales jurídicos que emiten un criterio próximo desde el ejercicio diario de su profesión.
This investigation is based on the critical analysis of the ninth paragraph of article 137 of the General Organic Code of Processes, an adjectival norm that regulates the procedure in cases of alimony. In addition, the investigation includes specific current cases in which the argumentative and practical dichotomy of the discretionary and non-discretionary application of the aforementioned article is evidenced, which establishes as a sine qua non requirement the total payment of the debt generated by non-payment of alimony in order for the obligor to recover the freedom of which he has been deprived by execution of personal compulsion. This research explains the legal, logical and practical impossibility of this happening in reality. It is not ignored that there are isolated cases where such an act is evident, but those cases are due to the sole reason that the debt is negligible, not those cases in which the debt amounts to more than 10 basic salaries. It is developed with a mixed methodology that involves field work and an approach to expert magistrates in the area of study and questions to legal professionals who issue a close opinion from the daily exercise of their profession.
This investigation is based on the critical analysis of the ninth paragraph of article 137 of the General Organic Code of Processes, an adjectival norm that regulates the procedure in cases of alimony. In addition, the investigation includes specific current cases in which the argumentative and practical dichotomy of the discretionary and non-discretionary application of the aforementioned article is evidenced, which establishes as a sine qua non requirement the total payment of the debt generated by non-payment of alimony in order for the obligor to recover the freedom of which he has been deprived by execution of personal compulsion. This research explains the legal, logical and practical impossibility of this happening in reality. It is not ignored that there are isolated cases where such an act is evident, but those cases are due to the sole reason that the debt is negligible, not those cases in which the debt amounts to more than 10 basic salaries. It is developed with a mixed methodology that involves field work and an approach to expert magistrates in the area of study and questions to legal professionals who issue a close opinion from the daily exercise of their profession.
Descripción
Palabras clave
APREMIO PERSONAL, DICOTOMÍA JURÍDICA, DERECHOS, OBLIGACIONES, PENSIÓN ALIMENTICIA.