Acceso a la Información Pública y el Habeas Data como Garantías Constitucionales de Datos Públicos y personales, análisis y diferencias.
Fecha
2023-03
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Políticas
Resumen
En el presente estudio de caso, se analizará y diferenciará entre la facultad de acceder a la información pública y los factores que ocasionan la vulneración de este derecho, la divergencia que surge durante la aplicación de las garantías jurisdiccionales como el habeas data que asegura también el acceso de información, de manera igualitaria, democrática y transparente a la población, pero con la debida protección, como medida para resolver el problema. Tenemos un derecho a la acción de acceso de información pública que se categoriza como un derecho fundamental que toda persona tiene de atraerse información, informar y ser informada de recibir y emitir información, conforman lo que se denomina en término de notable relevancia, que está aparejado sobre todo a la centralidad del conocimiento, las tecnologías asociadas a él y los medios de comunicación que tienen en las sociedades contemporáneas; y, el hábeas data que tiene como objetivo el desarrollo de la informática y las nuevas tecnologías de comunicación, como una respuesta a las nuevas posibilidades de archivo, difusión y acceso a información que facilita la exposición pública de datos personales y las consecuencias que eso puede tener en las personas y en sus intereses patrimoniales, estos aseguran el derecho a conocer las informaciones de carácter personal que obran en poder de terceros y con qué finalidad se manejan. La metodología será aquella que se refiere al derecho en el ámbito exclusivamente con un enfoque cualitativo el carácter descriptivo; por otra parte, los métodos a intervenir son es lógicohistórico, inductivo, y el de la fenomenología jurídica.
In the present case study, it will be analyzed and differentiated between the power to access public information and the factors that cause the violation of this right, the divergence that arises during the application of jurisdictional guarantees such as habeas data that also ensures the access to information, in an equal, democratic and transparent manner to the population, but with due protection, as a measure to solve the problem. We have a right to access public information action that is categorized as a fundamental right that every person has to receive information, inform and be informed of receiving and issuing information, make up what is called in terms of notable relevance, which is coupled above all to the centrality of knowledge, the technologies associated with it and the means of communication that they have in contemporary societies; and, the habeas data that has as its objective the development of information technology and new communication technologies, as a response to the new possibilities of archiving, dissemination and access to information that facilitates the public exposure of personal data and the consequences that this can have on people and their patrimonial interests, they ensure the right to know the personal information held by third parties and for what purpose it is handled. The methodology will be that which refers to the law in the field exclusively with a qualitative approach the descriptive character; On the other hand. The methods to intervene are logical-historical, inductive, and that of legal phenomenology.
In the present case study, it will be analyzed and differentiated between the power to access public information and the factors that cause the violation of this right, the divergence that arises during the application of jurisdictional guarantees such as habeas data that also ensures the access to information, in an equal, democratic and transparent manner to the population, but with due protection, as a measure to solve the problem. We have a right to access public information action that is categorized as a fundamental right that every person has to receive information, inform and be informed of receiving and issuing information, make up what is called in terms of notable relevance, which is coupled above all to the centrality of knowledge, the technologies associated with it and the means of communication that they have in contemporary societies; and, the habeas data that has as its objective the development of information technology and new communication technologies, as a response to the new possibilities of archiving, dissemination and access to information that facilitates the public exposure of personal data and the consequences that this can have on people and their patrimonial interests, they ensure the right to know the personal information held by third parties and for what purpose it is handled. The methodology will be that which refers to the law in the field exclusively with a qualitative approach the descriptive character; On the other hand. The methods to intervene are logical-historical, inductive, and that of legal phenomenology.
Descripción
Palabras clave
INFORMACIÓN, COMUNICACIÓN, VULNERACIÓN, DERECHO, GARANTÍAS, RELEVANCIA, INTERESES.