Límites a las garantías jurisdiccionales, evitando su desnaturalización y el menoscabo de los derechos constitucionales
Fecha
2024-02
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil. Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Políticas
Resumen
Este trabajo de investigación tuvo por objetivo general: Analizar los límites a las garantías jurisdiccionales, para evitar su desnaturalización y el menoscabo de los derechos constitucionales. Se empleó un enfoque mixto, diseño no experimental de tipo descriptivo, una revisión documental, encuesta y entrevista. La población representada por profesionales del derecho, abogados y jueces vinculados al sistema de justicia del Ecuador. En los resultados, un alto porcentaje de encuestados consideran que sí está claro lo tipificado en la Constitución en cuanto a las garantías constitucionales, no obstante, la práctica actual deja ver la falta de conocimiento y uso abusivo de las garantías siendo muchos casos desestimados por la Corte Constitucional; también se percibe una falta de cultura jurídica. Se propone una enmienda a la Constitución de la República del Ecuador en su artículo 86, donde se destaque la especialidad en la materia constitucional, así como la capacitación permanente de los jueces.
This research work had the general objective: Analyze the limits to jurisdictional guarantees, to avoid their denaturalization and the impairment of constitutional rights. A mixed approach was used, a non-experimental descriptive design, a documentary review, survey and interview. The population represented by legal professionals, lawyers and judges linked to the Ecuadorian justice system. In the results, a high percentage of respondents consider that what is typified in the Constitution in terms of constitutional guarantees is clear, however, current practice reveals the lack of knowledge and abusive use of guarantees, with many cases being dismissed by the Constitutional court; There is also a perceived lack of legal culture. An amendment is proposed to the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador in its article 86, where the specialty in constitutional matters is highlighted, as well as the permanent training of judges.
This research work had the general objective: Analyze the limits to jurisdictional guarantees, to avoid their denaturalization and the impairment of constitutional rights. A mixed approach was used, a non-experimental descriptive design, a documentary review, survey and interview. The population represented by legal professionals, lawyers and judges linked to the Ecuadorian justice system. In the results, a high percentage of respondents consider that what is typified in the Constitution in terms of constitutional guarantees is clear, however, current practice reveals the lack of knowledge and abusive use of guarantees, with many cases being dismissed by the Constitutional court; There is also a perceived lack of legal culture. An amendment is proposed to the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador in its article 86, where the specialty in constitutional matters is highlighted, as well as the permanent training of judges.
Descripción
BDER-TPrG 321-2024
Palabras clave
GARANTÍAS JURISDICCIONALES, VULNERACIÓN DE DERECHOS, DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL, ACCIÓN DE PROTECCIÓN, DESNATURALIZACIÓN DE DERECHOS.