Evaluación del desempeño docente de la carrera de ingeniería ambiental de la facultad de ciencias naturales, universidad de Guayaquil, frente al reglamento de escalafón y carrera docente. Propuesta de un sistema de evaluación docente alternativo
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
2014
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales. Universidad de Guayaquil
Resumen
La evaluación del desempeño docente es connatural a la Universidad, y punto neurálgico de la calidad de la Educación Superior. Constituye el indicador básico en la evaluación del CEAACES, aspecto poco atendido en dichas instituciones. Con este antecedente se realizó un diagnóstico del sistema de evaluación del desempeño docente, para proponer un sistema alternativo. El marco teórico comprende: Evaluación, Docente universitario, Currículo, Ingeniería Ambiental, Escalafón, Sistema y calidad de la Educación Superior. La modalidad de investigación es de proyecto factible, que corresponde a la investigación bibliográfica, de campo y una propuesta de intervención. Se investigó a una población de directivos, docentes y una muestra de estudiantes de 97 informantes, la variable independiente es Evaluación del Desempeño Docente y las dependientes, Reglamento de Escalafón y Carrera Docente y Diseño del Sistema de Evaluación. Se comprobó la hipótesis que el actual sistema de evaluación tiene serias fallas, criterio emitido por más del 60% de los informantes; por lo que es necesario proponer un sistema alternativo. Los beneficiarios de esta nueva propuesta de evaluación del desempeño docente, son los estudiantes que mejorarán su calidad profesional, al igual que la propia Facultad frente a un nuevo sistema de evaluación de calidad.
The teacher evaluation is inherent to the University, and focal point of the quality of higher education. It is the basic indicator in assessing CEAACES, underserved aspect in these institutions. With this background a diagnosis system teacher performance assessment was carried out to propose an alternative system. The framework comprises: Evaluation, University Professor, Curriculum, Environmental Engineering, Rank, and quality system of higher education. The research method is feasible project, which corresponds to the literature search, field and a proposal for intervention. We investigated a population of principals, teachers and students a sample of 97 informants, the independent variable is the Teacher Performance Assessment and dependent, and Rank Regulations and Design Educator Evaluation System. The hypothesis that the current system is seriously flawed evaluation criterion issued by more than 60% of the informants was found, so it is necessary to propose an alternative system. The beneficiaries of this new proposal for teacher evaluation are students improve their professional quality, as well as the Faculty itself facing a new quality evaluation system.
The teacher evaluation is inherent to the University, and focal point of the quality of higher education. It is the basic indicator in assessing CEAACES, underserved aspect in these institutions. With this background a diagnosis system teacher performance assessment was carried out to propose an alternative system. The framework comprises: Evaluation, University Professor, Curriculum, Environmental Engineering, Rank, and quality system of higher education. The research method is feasible project, which corresponds to the literature search, field and a proposal for intervention. We investigated a population of principals, teachers and students a sample of 97 informants, the independent variable is the Teacher Performance Assessment and dependent, and Rank Regulations and Design Educator Evaluation System. The hypothesis that the current system is seriously flawed evaluation criterion issued by more than 60% of the informants was found, so it is necessary to propose an alternative system. The beneficiaries of this new proposal for teacher evaluation are students improve their professional quality, as well as the Faculty itself facing a new quality evaluation system.
Descripción
Palabras clave
DOCENTE, EVALUACIÓN