Validación de la conciliación en el delito de robo en la causa penal 09290-2019-00883
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
2020-06
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Jurisprudencia Ciencias Sociales y Políticas
Resumen
La Constitución de la República del año 2008, reconoce el arbitraje y la mediación como métodos para la solución de conflictos y, el nuevo Código Orgánico Integral Penal que entró en vigencia en el año 2014, reconoce a la conciliación penal en caso de menores infractores, así también prevee la posibilidad de que las partes en conflicto llegaran a un acuerdo, en el caso que la pena no sea mayor a los cinco años. Esto es en los casos que no existan accidentes mortales en delitos de tránsito, y en delitos contra la propiedad que no supere los treinta salarios básicos.
A diferencia de la metodología de la conciliación, este ofrece dos oportunidades en el proceso, como para que se dé un convenio entre los litigantes, y sin dar garantía debe de existir un acuerdo justo. Por otro lado, en la conciliación debe existir el ánimo o una posibilidad de querer llegar a un acuerdo justo para las partes con la intervención de una tercera persona especializada en el tema, que esta sea imparcial, ya que esta persona será la que dirija el diálogo entre las partes comprometidas; además, velará por cada uno de los intereses de los litigantes. De esta forma, la mediación o conciliación para la víctima como el infractor, mediante el diálogo, ellos serán las únicas personas en resolver sus diferencias y buscarán los mecanismos de solución en forma rápida sin necesidad de acudir a procesos judiciales penales.
The Constitution of the Republic of 2008 recognizes arbitration and mediation as methods for the resolution of conflicts and, the new Integral Criminal Organic Code that entered into force in 2014, recognizes criminal conciliation in the case of minor offenders, This also provides for the possibility that the parties to the conflict reach an agreement, in the event that the penalty is not greater than five years. This is in cases where there are no fatal accidents in traffic offenses, and in crimes against property that do not exceed thirty basic salaries. Unlike the conciliation methodology, it offers two opportunities in the process, such as for an agreement between the litigants, and without giving a guarantee there must be a fair agreement. On the other hand, in the conciliation there must be the spirit or a possibility of wanting to reach a fair agreement for the parties with the intervention of a third person specialized in the subject, that this is impartial, since this person will be the one who directs the dialogue between the parties involved; in addition, it will watch over each of the interests of the litigants. In this way, mediation or conciliation for the victim as the offender, through dialogue, they will be the only people to resolve their differences and will seek the mechanisms of solution quickly without resorting to criminal judicial proceedings.
The Constitution of the Republic of 2008 recognizes arbitration and mediation as methods for the resolution of conflicts and, the new Integral Criminal Organic Code that entered into force in 2014, recognizes criminal conciliation in the case of minor offenders, This also provides for the possibility that the parties to the conflict reach an agreement, in the event that the penalty is not greater than five years. This is in cases where there are no fatal accidents in traffic offenses, and in crimes against property that do not exceed thirty basic salaries. Unlike the conciliation methodology, it offers two opportunities in the process, such as for an agreement between the litigants, and without giving a guarantee there must be a fair agreement. On the other hand, in the conciliation there must be the spirit or a possibility of wanting to reach a fair agreement for the parties with the intervention of a third person specialized in the subject, that this is impartial, since this person will be the one who directs the dialogue between the parties involved; in addition, it will watch over each of the interests of the litigants. In this way, mediation or conciliation for the victim as the offender, through dialogue, they will be the only people to resolve their differences and will seek the mechanisms of solution quickly without resorting to criminal judicial proceedings.
Descripción
Palabras clave
ARBITRAJE Y MEDIACIÓN, METODOLOGÍA DE LA CONCILIACIÓN